Emacs vs Vim: Which One is the Best Code Editor for You?

Posted on

Table of Contents

When it comes to code editors, there are few that are as popular and long-standing as Emacs and Vim. Both editors have been around for decades and have gained a loyal following of developers who swear by their unique features and workflows. But which one should you use? Let’s take a closer look at both editors to help you make an informed decision.

Emacs is a popular and versatile code editor that has been around since the mid-1980s. It was originally created by Richard Stallman, the founder of the Free Software Foundation. Emacs is written in Lisp, and it has a powerful Lisp interpreter built into it, allowing users to customize and extend the editor to suit their specific needs.

Emacs is known for its extensive collection of packages and modes, which allow users to add features and functionality to the editor. It also has a wide range of modes for different programming languages, making it a great choice for developers who work with multiple languages.

One of the standout features of Emacs is its ability to be used as an integrated development environment (IDE). With its modes for different languages, Emacs can provide syntax highlighting, code completion, debugging, and other features that are typically found in a full-fledged IDE.

Emacs also has a built-in file manager, making it easy to navigate and organize your files within the editor. Additionally, Emacs has support for multiple windows and frames, allowing you to switch between different files and buffers with ease.

Vim is a popular and powerful code editor that was first released in 1991. It was created as a successor to the original Vi editor, and it has since gained a loyal following of users who appreciate its speed and efficiency.

better code editor for programmer

Vim’s interface is based on a command-line interface, and it has a modal editing system that allows users to switch between different modes to perform different tasks, such as editing, navigation, and selection. This can make it faster to perform certain tasks than in other editors.

Like Emacs, Vim has a large collection of plugins and scripts that can be used to customize the editor to your liking. It also has built-in support for version control systems like Git, making it a great choice for developers who work on large codebases.

Vim’s efficiency and speed have made it a popular choice among developers who value productivity and the ability to work quickly and efficiently. However, Vim does have a steep learning curve, and it can take some time to get used to its interface and commands.

How is Emacs different from Vim?

  1. User Interface and Design
  2. Learning Curve and Ease of Use
  3. Features and Functionality
  4. Customization and Extensibility
  5. Supported Programming Languages and Environments
  6. Performance and Resource Requirements
  7. Plugins and Third-Party Integrations
  8. Comparison of Command Sets
  9. Common Myths and Misconceptions
  10. Differences in Syntax Highlighting and Indentation
  11. Common and uncommon functionalities
  12. Macro Recording and Playback
  13. Integration with Version Control Systems

User Interface and Design

Emacs has a very flexible and customizable user interface that can be tailored to suit the individual preferences of its users. The default interface includes a command bar at the bottom of the screen where users can enter commands and navigate through files. Emacs also features a graphical user interface (GUI) that includes menus and toolbars for easy navigation. Additionally, Emacs has a wide variety of built-in features and extensions, including support for multiple programming languages, version control, and syntax highlighting.

Vim, on the other hand, has a much more minimalist user interface. It is primarily designed to be used from the command line, and it features a text-based interface that can be operated entirely with keyboard shortcuts. Vim also has a modal editing system that allows users to switch between different editing modes, such as insert mode and command mode, for more efficient editing. While Vim may lack some of the features of Emacs, it is renowned for its speed and efficiency.

Learning Curve and Ease of Use

When it comes to a learning curve and ease of use, Emacs and Vim have some distinct differences.

Emacs has a relatively steep learning curve due to its vast array of features and customization options. It can take some time for users to learn how to use all of Emacs’ features effectively, and its extensive documentation may require some effort to navigate. However, once users become proficient in Emacs, they can be highly productive and efficient. Emacs’ flexibility and customizability allow users to tailor it to their specific needs, which can make it easier to use in the long run.

In contrast, Vim has a reputation for having a steeper learning curve than most text editors, largely due to its modal editing system. Vim’s unique approach to editing can be challenging for new users, as it requires mastering keyboard shortcuts and modes of operation. However, Vim’s command-line interface is straightforward and easy to navigate, and many users find that they become proficient in Vim fairly quickly once they get used to the modal editing system.

Both Emacs and Vim demand dedication and effort to master. Emacs is more customizable but complex, while Vim’s modal editing system is initially challenging, but its command-line interface is simple. Users of both editors have access to abundant resources developed by large communities, such as tutorials, plugins, and configuration files, that help new users learn more quickly.

Features and Functionality

Emacs and Vim differ significantly in terms of their features and functionality.

Emacs is highly versatile and customizable, with a vast array of built-in features and a powerful scripting language. It supports many programming languages and includes features like syntax highlighting, auto-completion, and code folding. Emacs is also equipped with support for version control, debugging, and project management, making it a comprehensive tool for power users and programmers.

In contrast, Vim is designed for efficient text editing, with a focus on speed and simplicity. Vim’s modal editing system allows users to switch between different modes for more efficient editing, and it supports features like syntax highlighting, auto-completion, and search and replace. While Vim also supports plugins, its feature set is generally more limited than Emacs, making it less suitable for users who require advanced features beyond efficient text editing.

Both Emacs and Vim offer distinct strengths and weaknesses when it comes to features and functionality. Emacs is highly customizable and offers a comprehensive set of features, making it a versatile tool for power users and programmers. Vim prioritizes efficient text editing and simplicity, making it an ideal choice for users who value speed and straightforwardness.

Customization and Extensibility

Emacs is highly customizable and extensible, with a vast array of built-in features and a powerful scripting language. Users can extend Emacs functionality with plugins and modes, making it suitable for a wide range of tasks.

Vim’s feature set is generally more limited than Emacs, but it does support plugins that can extend its functionality. Vim is less customizable than Emacs, but its modal editing system allows for efficient editing with keyboard shortcuts.

Emacs’ extensibility and customization options make it ideal for integrating with a wide range of programming tools, while Vim’s efficiency makes it a popular choice for command-line development in Unix-like environments.

Supported Programming Languages and Environments

Emacs supports a wide range of programming languages, making it a versatile choice for programmers. It has built-in support for many programming language modes, including syntax highlighting and indentation.

Vim also supports multiple programming languages, but its support is generally more limited than Emacs. Vim’s syntax highlighting and indentation features are customizable but may require additional configuration.

Both editors can be configured to work with various programming environments and tools, including compilers, debuggers, and build systems.

Performance and Resource Requirements

Vim is known for its speed and efficiency, making it a lightweight editor that requires fewer system resources. Vim’s text-based interface allows for quick navigation and editing, which can lead to improved performance on slower or resource-limited systems.

Emacs, on the other hand, is a more resource-intensive editor due to its extensive feature set and customization options. Emacs’ graphical user interface and scripting language may also require more memory and processing power.

However, Emacs’ versatility and customization options can allow users to optimize it for their specific needs and hardware.

Vim may be a better choice for users who prioritize speed and efficiency on lower-spec hardware, while Emacs’ customization options may make it a more suitable choice for power users who need a comprehensive set of features.

Plugins and Third-Party Integrations

Emacs has a vast library of plugins and extensions, making it highly extensible. Emacs’ Lisp-based architecture allows users to write plugins and extensions in a wide variety of programming languages.

Many third-party packages are available through the built-in package manager, including packages for version control, programming languages, and more.

Some popular third-party plugins for Emacs include:

Vim also has a large library of plugins and extensions, although it may not be as extensive as Emacs’. Many plugins are available through Vim’s package manager, Vim-Plug, which makes installation and management easier.

Vim also supports scripting in multiple languages, including Vimscript, Python, and Lua.

Some popular third-party plugins for Vim include:

Comparison of Command Sets

Emacs and Vim, both editors have a large set of commands and key bindings, and users may customize them to their liking. However, Vim’s command set is often considered more efficient and streamlined due to its modal editing system, where different commands are available in different modes, such as insert mode and command mode. Emacs’ command set is more traditional, with a focus on keyboard shortcuts and key combinations.

Overall, both editors have their strengths and weaknesses when it comes to command sets. Emacs’ traditional command set can be more familiar to users who are used to other text editors, while Vim’s modal editing system can be more efficient once users become comfortable with it.

Emacs Command sets:

C-x C-f: Open a file
C-x C-s: Save the current buffer
C-x C-c: Exit Emacs
M-x <command>: Run a specific command
C-x 2: Split the current window horizontally
C-x 3: Split the current window vertically
C-x o: Move to the next window

Vim Command Sets:

:w: Save the current file
:q: Quit Vim
:wq: Save and quit Vim
:set <option>: Set a Vim option, such as syntax highlighting or line numbering
yy: Yank (copy) the current line
p: Paste the contents of the yank buffer
gg: Move the cursor to the beginning of the file
G: Move the cursor to the end of the file
/<search term>: Search for a specific term in the file

Common Myths and Misconceptions

Here are some common myths and misconceptions about Emacs and Vim:

  1. Emacs is difficult to use: While Emacs can be more complex than other text editors, it has a wide range of features and customization options that make it a powerful tool for users who require a comprehensive set of features. The editor also has extensive documentation and a large community of users who have developed tutorials and other resources to help new users get started.
  2. Vim is only for developers: While Vim is popular among developers and programmers, it can be used for a wide range of text editing tasks. Vim’s keyboard-centric design and efficient editing commands can make it a good choice for anyone who works with text regularly, such as writers, journalists, and editors.
  3. Emacs is slow and resource-intensive: While Emacs can require more system resources than other text editors, such as Vim, it can be optimized and customized to work efficiently on different hardware configurations. Users can disable features they don’t need and adjust Emacs’ configuration to optimize its performance.
  4. Vim is only for command-line interfaces: While Vim was originally designed for use in command-line interfaces, it can be used in graphical environments as well. Vim includes a graphical user interface, and there are also several third-party graphical front-ends available.
  5. Emacs and Vim are outdated: While Emacs and Vim have been around for several decades, both editors continue to receive updates and new features. They also have large and active communities of users who continue to develop plugins, extensions, and other resources to keep the editors up-to-date and relevant.

Differences in Syntax Highlighting and Indentation

Both Emacs and Vim support syntax highlighting and indentation for various programming languages. However, there are some differences in how the editors handle these features.

Emacs:

  • Emacs has built-in support for syntax highlighting and indentation for many programming languages.
  • Emacs uses font-lock mode to highlight syntax, which allows users to customize the colors and styles used for highlighting.
  • Emacs’ indentation rules are customizable and can be adjusted to match different coding styles and standards.

Vim:

  • Vim also has built-in support for syntax highlighting and indentation for many programming languages.
  • Vim uses the syntax highlighting engine to highlight syntax, which allows users to customize the colors and styles used for highlighting.
  • Vim’s indentation rules are customizable and can be adjusted to match different coding styles and standards.

Common and uncommon functionalities

Emacs and Vim offer a rich set of commands for text editing and customization, allowing users to work efficiently and effectively with their preferred editor.

Common Functionalities In Vim and Emacs

  • Moving the cursor: Both Emacs and Vim allow users to move the cursor around the screen using a variety of commands, such as arrow keys, h/j/k/l (in Vim), or Ctrl-p/n/f/b (in Emacs).
  • Editing text: Both editors allow users to edit text using commands such as insert mode (in Vim), or Ctrl-d/y/k (in Emacs) to delete, yank (copy), and kill text.
  • Search and replace: Both editors allow users to search for text within a file and replace it using commands such as /<search term> (in Vim) or Ctrl-s/r (in Emacs).
  • File management: Both editors allow users to manage files using commands such as :w (in Vim) or C-x C-s (in Emacs) to save files, and :q (in Vim) or C-x C-c (in Emacs) to exit the editor.
  • Copy and paste: Both editors allow users to copy and paste text using commands such as yy (in Vim) or Ctrl-k/y (in Emacs) to copy text and p (in Vim) or Ctrl-y/e (in Emacs) to paste text.
  • Undo and redo: Both editors allow users to undo and redo changes using commands such as u (in Vim) or Ctrl-/_ (in Emacs) to undo changes and Ctrl-g _ (in Emacs) to redo changes.
  • Splitting and resizing windows: Both editors allow users to split the screen into multiple windows and resize them using commands such as :split and :vsplit (in Vim) or C-x 2 and C-x 3 (in Emacs).
  • Commenting and uncommenting: Both editors allow users to comment and uncomment lines of code using commands such as :s/^/#/g and :s/^#//g (in Vim) or M-; (in Emacs).
  • Find and replace: Both editors allow users to find and replace text within a file using commands such as :s/<search term>/<replace term>/g (in Vim) or M-% (in Emacs).
  • Moving between files: Both editors allow users to move between open files using commands such as :bnext and :bprev (in Vim) or C-x C-b (in Emacs).
  • Buffer management: Both editors allow users to manage open buffers using commands such as :ls and :bdelete (in Vim) or C-x b and C-x k (in Emacs).
  • Macro recording and playback: Both editors allow users to record and playback macros for automating repetitive tasks using commands such as q<letter> and @<letter> (in Vim) or F3 and F4 (in Emacs).

Uncommon Functionalities In Vim and Emacs

Uncommon Commands in Emacs:

  • Org-mode: Emacs’ built-in org-mode provides a variety of commands for organizing and managing notes, tasks, and more. Some examples include Ctrl-c Ctrl-t (to add a timestamp) and Ctrl-c Ctrl-x Ctrl-t (to cycle between todo states).
  • Macros: Emacs allows users to record and replay macros, which can be useful for automating repetitive tasks. Macros can be recorded using Ctrl-x ( to start recording, and Ctrl-x ) to stop recording.
  • Multiple cursors: Emacs’ multiple-cursors mode allows users to edit multiple occurrences of text simultaneously. Users can activate multiple cursors using Ctrl-c Ctrl-l, and then use standard editing commands to edit all cursors at once.
  • Dired mode: Emacs’ built-in dired mode provides a powerful file management interface, allowing users to perform file operations such as copy, move, and delete within Emacs itself.
  • Tramp mode: Emacs’ built-in tramp mode provides remote file editing capabilities, allowing users to edit files on remote servers as if they were local files.
  • Bookmarks: Emacs’ bookmarking feature allows users to mark specific locations within a file and easily navigate to them using commands such as C-x r m and C-x r b.

Uncommon Commands in Vim:

  • Visual block mode: Vim’s visual block mode allows users to select text in a block shape, which can be useful for editing columns of data. Users can activate visual block mode using Ctrl-v.
  • Registers: Vim’s registers allow users to store and retrieve snippets of text for later use. Users can store text in a register using “x (where x is the register name), and retrieve text using “xp.
  • Folding: Vim’s folding feature allows users to collapse sections of code for easier navigation and editing. Users can create folds using commands such as zf and zo.
  • Registers: Vim’s registers allow users to store and retrieve snippets of text for later use. Users can store text in a register using “x (where x is the register name), and retrieve text using “xp.
  • Vimdiff: Vim’s built-in diff mode allows users to compare and edit two files side-by-side, with highlighted differences between the two files.
  • Spell-checking: Vim’s built-in spell-checking feature allows users to check the spelling of their text using commands such as :set spell and ]s.

Macro Recording and Playback

When it comes to testing, both Emacs and Vim offer macro recording and playback features that can be useful for automating repetitive tasks and testing workflows. Here’s how the two editors compare in terms of their macro recording and playback capabilities:

Emacs:

  • Emacs allows users to record and playback macros using the kmacro package, which is built into the editor.
  • Users can start recording a macro using the C-x ( key sequence, and stop recording using the C-x ) key sequence. Macros can be played back using the C-x e key sequence.
  • Users can also save macros for later use using the kmacro-save macro command.
  • Emacs’ macro recording and playback features are highly customizable, with users able to edit and refine recorded macros using Emacs’ built-in text editing commands.

Vim:

  • Vim allows users to record and playback macros using the q and @ commands.
  • Users can start recording a macro using the q<letter> command, where <letter> is any lowercase letter of the alphabet. Macros can be stopped using the q command again.
  • Macros can be played back using the @<letter> command, where <letter> is the letter used to start the macro recording.
  • Users can also save macros for later use by writing them to a file, which can be sourced in Vim later.
  • Vim’s macro recording and playback features are highly efficient, with users able to record and playback macros quickly and easily.

Integration with Version Control Systems

When comparing Emacs and Vim for Integrating with version control systems (VCS), both Emacs and Vim provide robust support for a variety of VCS tools. Here’s how they compare in terms of support, ease of use, and plugins:

Emacs:

  • Emacs provides built-in support for a variety of version control systems, including Git, Subversion, and Mercurial.
  • Users can perform basic VCS operations (such as commit, push, and pull) using Emacs’ built-in VC mode.
  • Users can also use Emacs’ magit package, a powerful Git interface that provides advanced Git functionality within Emacs.
  • Emacs’ VCS integration is highly customizable, with users able to configure the editor to work with specific VCS tools and workflows.

Vim:

  • Vim also provides robust support for version control systems, with built-in support for Git, Subversion, Mercurial, and others.
  • Users can perform basic VCS operations using Vim’s command-line interface, as well as with third-party plugins such as fugitive.vim (for Git).
  • Vim’s VCS integration is highly efficient, with users able to perform VCS operations quickly and easily.
  • Vim’s VCS integration is also highly customizable, with users able to configure the editor to work with specific VCS tools and workflows.

Emacs vs Vim: Pros and Cons

Emacs Pros:

  • Customizability: Emacs is highly customizable, allowing programmers to tailor the editor to their specific needs and workflows.
  • Versatility: Emacs can be used for a wide range of programming languages and environments, making it a flexible tool for programmers.
  • Integration: Emacs has strong integration with various development tools and version control systems.
  • Package management: Emacs provides a powerful package management system (ELPA) that makes it easy to install and manage packages.
  • Extensibility: Emacs is highly extensible, allowing programmers to write and integrate their own plugins and extensions.
  • Built-in documentation: Emacs has built-in documentation and help features, making it easier for programmers to learn and use the editor.
  • Multiple editing modes: Emacs offers multiple editing modes (such as text, code, and org-mode) that can be customized and tailored to the specific needs of the programmer.

Emac Cons:

  • Steep learning curve: Emacs can be difficult to learn for beginners, with a wide range of commands and customization options that can be overwhelming.
  • Resource-intensive: Emacs can be resource-intensive, especially with extensive customization or large files.
  • Non-standard interface: Emacs’ interface is not always consistent with other applications, which can lead to a learning curve and confusion for some users.
  • Non-standard interface: Emacs’ interface can be non-standard and different from other text editors and development tools, which can lead to a learning curve and confusion for some users.
  • Lack of consistency: Emacs’ customization options can lead to inconsistency across different installations and setups, making it difficult for some users to share their workflows and configurations.
  • Slower startup time: Emacs’ startup time can be slower than other text editors, especially with extensive customization and packages installed.

Vim Pros:

  • Efficiency: Vim is known for its efficient command-line interface, allowing programmers to work quickly and effectively.
  • Lightweight: Vim is a lightweight editor that can handle large files and multiple buffers with ease.
  • Customizability: Like Emacs, Vim is highly customizable, allowing programmers to tailor the editor to their specific needs and workflows.
  • Integration: Vim has strong integration with various development tools and version control systems.
  • Speed: Vim is known for its speed and efficiency, making it a great choice for programmers who need to work quickly.
  • Portable: Vim is highly portable and can be used on a wide range of operating systems and platforms.
  • Strong community support: Vim has a large and active community of users and developers, providing a wealth of resources, plugins, and support.

Vim Cons:

  • Steep learning curve: Vim’s modal editing system can be challenging to learn for beginners.
  • Limited versatility: Vim may not be as versatile as Emacs when it comes to working with certain programming languages and environments.
  • Package management: Vim’s package management system (Vundle) is not as powerful as Emacs’ ELPA.
  • Modal editing system: Vim’s modal editing system can be difficult to learn and get used to for some users.
  • Lack of versatility: Vim may not be as versatile as Emacs when it comes to working with certain programming languages and environments.
  • Limited customization: Vim’s customization options may be more limited than Emacs’, which can be a drawback for some programmers who need more flexibility.

Written by

I am a software engineer with over 10 years of experience in blogging and web development. I have expertise in both front-end and back-end development, as well as database design, web security, and SEO.